Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Lesson | IB MYP & ELA Resource

Educational non-profits like the International Baccalaureate and others do a good job of standardizing practices that teachers have been using for decades — perhaps even generations. I made a lesson resource on teaching Plato's Allegory of the Cave . And it has served me well as an educator. However, I wondered if it would hold up to IB standards. Let's see.

— Greig from Stones of Erasmus

---

I wondered aloud: Does "The Cave" lesson align with MYP by linking communication, perspective, and inquiry on truth? It does. Let’s break it down using International Baccalaureate language.

Image Credit: Stefano Pollio

IB Middle Years Program (Language & Literature)

Let’s think about how the Cave lesson ties to the IB’s scope: The IB MYP spans ~Grades 6–10 (Years 1–5). While I think it does a good job aligning standards to this grade band, it also works really well with Grades 11–12; Check out the end of this post — I include an optional IB Diploma Program bridge at the end.

Unit framing (ready to paste into the International Baccalaureate proprietary learning management system ManageBac/Atlas)

• Subject group: Language & Literature (since IB schools use scores of other resources, please know that this lesson on the Cave can co-badge with Individuals & Societies)
  

• Key concept: Communication (how representations convey/shape meaning)

• Related concepts: Perspective, Representation, Intertextuality

• Global context: Personal & cultural expression (how ideas of truth/reality are expressed)

• Statement of inquiry: Representations of reality shape what we accept as truth.

• Inquiry questions

• Factual: What is an allegory? What happens in Plato’s cave?

• Conceptual: How do perspectives and media filter our perception of reality?

• Debatable: Are images and stories reliable ways to know what is “real”?

Approaches to Learning Skills (explicit teach/track)

• Thinking: critical & creative (evaluate claims; generate analogies), transfer (text-to-world/media).

• Research/Media literacy: source purpose, bias, provenance (incl. film clips, diagrams).

• Communication: organizing ideas for oral seminar; crafting clear analytical paragraphs.

• Self-management: goal setting for seminar roles; exit tickets for metacognition.

Learning experiences (adapting the Stones of Erasmus flow to the IB MYP)

1. Hook/Do-Now (5–7 min). Quick write to Essential Q (How do I know what’s real?)—keep. Tie to SOI/inquiry questions.
   

2. Close reading (15–20). Read the plain-language text of The Cave; annotate symbols and shifts (chains/shadows/fire/sun/return). Pair-share a gist paragraph. Note — all of these resources are turn-key and ready to go in the Stones of Erasmus learning resource.

3. Guided discussion (15). Use Qs 1–3; introduce Two Worlds chart with a Socratic “hot seat”: defend/critique Plato’s hierarchy (knowledge vs. opinion/images).

4. Intertextual link (10). Matrix/Truman Show clips; students record claim-evidence-reasoning on an organizer (media as “cave”).
   

5. Exit ticket (3–5). One way the allegory appears in their world (social media, VR, advertising).

---

Summative Assessment Ideas (MYP Years 2–5)

Task A — Literary analysis paragraph/mini-essay

Prompt: Explain how one symbol in the allegory develops Plato’s claim about reality and knowledge. Use precise textual evidence.

• Assesses: Criterion A (Analysing) & D (Using language)
  
  

• Success criteria (adapted from levels 5–8):
  
  

• Adept selection of evidence; clear explanation of how form (allegory/symbol) creates meaning; coherent argument; accurate, sophisticated language.

Task B — Socratic seminar with media comparison

Prompt: To what extent is the “cave” a useful metaphor for today’s media environments? Bring one outside example.

• Assesses: Criterion A (Analysing) & C (Producing text—spoken)
  
  

• Products: Pre-seminar position card (organized notes), 10–15 min seminar, reflective paragraph on shifts in your view.
  
  

• Criteria emphasis: Organization for purpose/audience; development and synthesis of ideas; clear oral expression and active listening.

Task C — Creative representation + rationale

Prompt: Redesign the cave metaphor for a modern context (comic strip, infographic, micro-fiction, short video) and write a 300–500 word rationale justifying your choices using allegory terminology.

• Assesses: Criterion C (Producing text) & D (Using language)
  
  

• Criteria emphasis: Purposeful structure, stylistic choices, vocabulary control, explanation of creative decisions using subject language.

Optional extension (Year 5): Comparative analysis of Plato and a contemporary thinker on reality/representation (e.g., Baudrillard excerpt), meeting A & D at higher sophistication.

---

MYP Criterion for The Allegory of the Cave in Plain Language

Stones of Erasmus resource element	MYP objective(s) it best serves	Notes / quick tweaks
Plain-language reading & gist	A (identify explicit/implicit ideas); D (accurate vocabulary)	Keep gist but add a one-pager of tiered vocabulary with sentence frames.
Comprehension Qs 1–15	A	Convert some to text-dependent “how/why” prompts to push analysis (Aiii).
Discussion Qs 1–6	A, C, D	Add discussion norms & roles for equitable talk.
Two Worlds chart	A	Add a mini-task: students critique or revise the hierarchy (does art only belong “below the line”?).
Suggested lesson plan	All (formative sequence)	Insert explicit ATL callouts and success criteria per activity.
Sample student visuals/notes	C, D	Keep creative outputs; add a required rationale paragraph (Cii/iii).

---

Quick MYP-ready Rubrics Ready-to-Use

• Criterion A (Analysing)
  
  

• 7–8: Perceptive analysis of content/technique/context; well-chosen evidence; insightful conclusions.
  
  

• 5–6: Effective analysis with relevant evidence; clear conclusions.
  
  

• 3–4: Some analysis; uneven evidence.
  
  

• 1–2: Limited comprehension/description.
  
  

• Criterion B (Organizing) (use for essay tasks where structure is assessed)
  
  

• 7–8: Purposeful organization; cohesive paragraphs; effective referencing.
  
  

• ... (scale down similarly)
  
  

• Criterion C (Producing text)
  
  

• 7–8: Sophisticated choices for purpose/audience; coherent development; engaging style.
  
  

• ...
  
  

• Criterion D (Using language)
  
  

• 7–8: Precise, varied vocabulary; accurate grammar; subject-specific terms used effectively.
  
  

• ...

---

Differentiation & inclusion (MYP-aligned)

• Scaffolds: dual-coding (images + text), guided annotations, sentence starters for claims/rebuttals, glossary for allegory, epistemology, empirical, abstract.
  

• Extensions: add a primary-source excerpt from Republic Book VII for close reading; student-led colloquy on whether art belongs “below the line.”
  

• Wellbeing: pre-teach the “killing the freed man” as allegorical; offer opt-out from that specific detail if needed.

---

Strengths & Suggestions and Growth Areas

Strengths

• Clear essential question and high-interest, accessible retelling—excellent for mixed-readiness classes.
  
  

• Ready-to-use discussion/comprehension sets + answer keys; strong entry into philosophical thinking for ELA.
  
  

• Authentic classroom provenance with student artifacts and teacher reflections (credibility + practicality).

---

Optional bridge to Grades 11–12 (IB DP)

• TOK: Knowledge question—To what extent are sense perceptions reliable ways of knowing? Link Areas of Knowledge: The Arts vs Human Sciences using the cave as metaphor

• Language A: Literature: Paper-2 style comparative prompt on representation vs. reality across texts/films.

PDF Copy for Printing

Deciphering the Language of Manipulation: From Billboards to Broadcasts

Percy writes about perception and reality in his 1961 novel The Moviegoer.

In this post, I explore the captivating world of language manipulation and marketing tactics by making my own thought experiment called "Walker Percy's Hamburger."

Would you like a yummy hamburger?

Metaphorical Journey into Authenticity

Picture this: You're cruising down a highway, and suddenly, an image of a perfect, glistening hamburger on a billboard catches your eye. This isn't just any burger; it's an artistic masterpiece that sends your taste buds into a frenzy. It's got glistening lettuce peeking out of the bun, a crispy patty, oozing mayo, and an immaculate spherical bun. This image is so compelling that you find yourself making an unplanned pit stop at the advertised restaurant. However, the reality that awaits you, sadly, is far from the tantalizing image promised. This dichotomy between representation and reality is a phenomenon that American novelist Walker Percy masterfully encapsulated. It also presents a fascinating lens through which we can explore the influence and manipulation of language, especially within the realm of our capitalist consumption.

Walker Percy's Hamburger

Walker Percy's illustration of the mouth-watering burger, which ends in disappointment, serves as a perfect metaphor for how language and marketing tactics can manipulate our expectations. These linguistic structures have a unique way of extending our experiences by luring us with attractive phrases, glamorous pictures, and strategically crafted narratives. One could even say that these structures are filled with what some have coined as "non-content fillables". They don't necessarily provide new information or factual content, yet they prove irresistible. Terms like "popular", "famous", or "most visited" are quintessential examples of these fillables. They aren't verifiable facts or insightful opinions, but they command attention and evoke intrigue, often without any accountability from the advertiser.

This practice extends beyond the fast-food industry and permeates our social world, shaping our perceptions and our consumption patterns. One might argue that these manipulative language structures hinder our ability to experience reality authentically or that they foster distrust. Yet, I propose a different perspective: This phenomenon could also serve as a tool to sharpen our critical thinking. It encourages us to dissect and investigate what's presented to us, essentially turning us into detectives of authenticity in an era of manufactured realities.

Writing a Movie Review: Writer's Workshop for Middle and High School Grades 8-10

Incorporating Movies into English Language Arts and Writing Instruction

Unlock English mastery! Transform your classroom with
engaging movie reviews that boost language skills, critical thinking,
and student participation.

Movies are more than just an engaging way to pass the time. They are an amalgamation of storytelling, characterization, themes, and visual representation, which offer a vibrant medium to teach English language arts and writing instruction. Imagine this — your class of young, energetic middle or high schoolers analyzing, discussing, and reviewing movies while learning and honing their English skills. Not only is it fun and engaging, but it also provides an interactive way to understand complex language structures, themes, and concepts.

What's Included?

1. Teacher's Note for Using this Resource in the English and Writing Classroom: A helpful guide to ensure you get the most out of the resources provided.

2. Do's and Don'ts Anchor Chart: A visual guide to direct students on what to include and what to avoid in their movie review.

3. Fillable Movie Information Sheet for Before, During, and After Viewing: This allows students to track key information and impressions throughout the viewing experience, which helps build their review later.

4. Extended Written Response, Movie Quotes Double Entry Journal, Parts of a Movie Review Graphic Organizer: These tools support and scaffold students' writing, thinking, and reflection processes.

5. 3 Exit Ticket Strategies for Formative Assessment: These will help you gauge student understanding and progress at the end of each lesson.

6. Movie Review Skills Assessment, 4-Point Grading Rubric, Student-Facing Checklist, and Grading Sheet: These tools help students self-assess their work and aid teachers in providing clear, fair, and consistent grading.

7. 5-Star Rating and Rough Draft Starter: This provides students a starting point for their review and a simple, familiar way to give their overall rating.

Incorporating movie analysis into your curriculum can be a dynamic way to inspire student engagement and improve their English language and writing skills. By combining entertainment and education, you're teaching them language and skills like critical thinking, analysis, and self-expression.

Related Products

To further extend your resources, consider other products from Stones of Erasmus:

✰ Growing Humanities Bundle for Middle and High School 

✰ Myth Unit for Middle and High School (40+ Days of Content!) 

✰ "A Good Man is Hard to Find" by Flannery O'Connor: Short Story Discussion 

✰ Diagnostic English Language Learner Exams and Essay for Middle and High School

✰ Making Timelines and Recalling Events for Writing in English Language Arts

✰ Integrating Quotations: Writing Activity for the English Language Arts Classroom

Join me on this educational journey. Your feedback, comments, and insights are always welcome. Visit my website at stonesoferasmus.com for more resources and ideas.

© 2022-2023 Stones of Erasmus.

PDF Copy for Printing